<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 669 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found SEBI&#039;s order procedurally flawed for denying the appellant&#039;s right to cross-examine key witnesses, emphasizing natural justice. The matter was remanded to SEBI for the appellant to cross-examine witnesses and issue a fresh order. The appeal was allowed through remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2017 18:56:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 669 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found SEBI&#039;s order procedurally flawed for denying the appellant&#039;s right to cross-examine key witnesses, emphasizing natural justice. The matter was remanded to SEBI for the appellant to cross-examine witnesses and issue a fresh order. The appeal was allowed through remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>