<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 72 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9944</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for proportionate allowance of premium payable on the redemption of debentures. It held that the liability to pay premium arose when the debentures were issued, making it an allowable expenditure under the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that spreading the liability over the years provides a more accurate financial representation and dismissed the appeals, finding no substantial question of law for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 72 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9944</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for proportionate allowance of premium payable on the redemption of debentures. It held that the liability to pay premium arose when the debentures were issued, making it an allowable expenditure under the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that spreading the liability over the years provides a more accurate financial representation and dismissed the appeals, finding no substantial question of law for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>