<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 777 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194635</link>
    <description>Disputes arising from a lease agreement, including arrears of rent, water and sewerage tax, and interest, fell within the arbitration clause and were capable of determination by an arbitral tribunal. The Court also held that Article 142 should not be used to bypass the statutory arbitration mechanism where the monetary claims were disputed and required evidence-based adjudication. As the amounts payable were contested on facts and calculations, direct grant of substantive relief was declined and the parties were left to have their claims decided in arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2017 17:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 777 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194635</link>
      <description>Disputes arising from a lease agreement, including arrears of rent, water and sewerage tax, and interest, fell within the arbitration clause and were capable of determination by an arbitral tribunal. The Court also held that Article 142 should not be used to bypass the statutory arbitration mechanism where the monetary claims were disputed and required evidence-based adjudication. As the amounts payable were contested on facts and calculations, direct grant of substantive relief was declined and the parties were left to have their claims decided in arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>