https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194634 The Tribunal acknowledged the delay in disposing of the stay application, causing prejudice to Revenue. It noted the lack of consideration of submissions by the Commissioner (Appeals) and affirmed the Commissioner's lack of power to modify orders. The Tribunal set aside previous orders, directing the appellant to reapply for a stay within 15 days. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to schedule a hearing promptly, with the appellant required to present its case without adjournment. The Commissioner (Appeals) was further directed to issue a notice within 15 days to comply with the Tribunal's directives, ultimately remanding the appeal for reconsideration. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Sep 2017 17:24:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194634 The Tribunal acknowledged the delay in disposing of the stay application, causing prejudice to Revenue. It noted the lack of consideration of submissions by the Commissioner (Appeals) and affirmed the Commissioner's lack of power to modify orders. The Tribunal set aside previous orders, directing the appellant to reapply for a stay within 15 days. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to schedule a hearing promptly, with the appellant required to present its case without adjournment. The Commissioner (Appeals) was further directed to issue a notice within 15 days to comply with the Tribunal's directives, ultimately remanding the appeal for reconsideration. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194634