https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348137 The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant constituted 'Business Support Services', subjecting them to service tax. Despite later classification under 'Renting of Immovable Property', services provided earlier were correctly classified. The extended period for demand was justified due to the appellant's failure to disclose information, leading to penalties upheld by the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the adjudicating authority's decision. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348137 The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant constituted 'Business Support Services', subjecting them to service tax. Despite later classification under 'Renting of Immovable Property', services provided earlier were correctly classified. The extended period for demand was justified due to the appellant's failure to disclose information, leading to penalties upheld by the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the adjudicating authority's decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348137