<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 880 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348123</link>
    <description>Service tax is chargeable with reference to the date of rendition of the service, not the date of receipt of payment; the applicable rate is therefore the rate in force when the service is performed. Applying that settled principle, the Tribunal sustained the order dropping the disputed demand and rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2017 09:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 880 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348123</link>
      <description>Service tax is chargeable with reference to the date of rendition of the service, not the date of receipt of payment; the applicable rate is therefore the rate in force when the service is performed. Applying that settled principle, the Tribunal sustained the order dropping the disputed demand and rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>