<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 878 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demands on erection, commissioning, and installation services, royalty income, and marketing support services, remanding the matter for further examination. The demand on charges for maintenance of software was also deemed unsustainable. The adjudicating authority was instructed to decide the issues on merits based on the observations provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2017 09:01:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 878 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demands on erection, commissioning, and installation services, royalty income, and marketing support services, remanding the matter for further examination. The demand on charges for maintenance of software was also deemed unsustainable. The adjudicating authority was instructed to decide the issues on merits based on the observations provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>