https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348110 The appellant was found to have fraudulently availed of cenvat credit on Stainless Steel Coil. The initial denial of cenvat credit was based on discrepancies in transportation. The appellant argued that the input was received and sent for job work, but this defense was not fully considered. The Member identified a violation of natural justice, directing a re-consideration with instructions to review key statements, allow cross-examination, and conduct a fair adjudication within three months. The appeals were allowed for remand, emphasizing the importance of a fair process and consideration of all submissions. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348110 The appellant was found to have fraudulently availed of cenvat credit on Stainless Steel Coil. The initial denial of cenvat credit was based on discrepancies in transportation. The appellant argued that the input was received and sent for job work, but this defense was not fully considered. The Member identified a violation of natural justice, directing a re-consideration with instructions to review key statements, allow cross-examination, and conduct a fair adjudication within three months. The appeals were allowed for remand, emphasizing the importance of a fair process and consideration of all submissions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348110