<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 77 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9932</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1994-95. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the assessee to claim depreciation separately, despite applying a net profit rate of 8 per cent. It emphasized that the necessary particulars were provided by the assessee, including audit accounts, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument of inadequate documentation. The court reaffirmed the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim depreciation and other business expenses, like salary and interest, even with a net profit rate, due to deficient bookkeeping. The appeal was consequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 77 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9932</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1994-95. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the assessee to claim depreciation separately, despite applying a net profit rate of 8 per cent. It emphasized that the necessary particulars were provided by the assessee, including audit accounts, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument of inadequate documentation. The court reaffirmed the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim depreciation and other business expenses, like salary and interest, even with a net profit rate, due to deficient bookkeeping. The appeal was consequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>