<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 835 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348078</link>
    <description>The court held that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act could be settled under &#039;The Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016&#039;. The orders withdrawing penalty imposition were deemed invalid, and the petitioner was entitled to the benefits of the Amnesty Scheme. The court directed the tax department to reassess the application based on this interpretation and issue new orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 835 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348078</link>
      <description>The court held that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act could be settled under &#039;The Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016&#039;. The orders withdrawing penalty imposition were deemed invalid, and the petitioner was entitled to the benefits of the Amnesty Scheme. The court directed the tax department to reassess the application based on this interpretation and issue new orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>