https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194615 Preventive detention requires prompt execution, genuine consideration of whether ordinary criminal law is adequate, and diligent action by the authorities; delay or laxity can vitiate detention. The text notes that a prior pre-execution challenge does not bar scrutiny of the detention order after execution, and that service, receipt of notice, and appearance of the detenu within the forum can constitute part of the cause of action for territorial jurisdiction. It further states that failure to serve the order at the first available opportunity, together with non-application of mind on the availability of ordinary punitive law, undermines the subjective satisfaction required for a valid detention order. en-us Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:34:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194615 Preventive detention requires prompt execution, genuine consideration of whether ordinary criminal law is adequate, and diligent action by the authorities; delay or laxity can vitiate detention. The text notes that a prior pre-execution challenge does not bar scrutiny of the detention order after execution, and that service, receipt of notice, and appearance of the detenu within the forum can constitute part of the cause of action for territorial jurisdiction. It further states that failure to serve the order at the first available opportunity, together with non-application of mind on the availability of ordinary punitive law, undermines the subjective satisfaction required for a valid detention order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194615