<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1097 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194616</link>
    <description>In preventive detention matters, a post-execution habeas corpus challenge remains maintainable where an earlier pre-execution challenge was left open for permissible grounds after service of the detention order. Territorial jurisdiction can be founded where the detention order is served, custody is suffered, and related rejection communications are received within the Court&#039;s limits. Material placed before the Detaining Authority must include written submissions and settlement-record documents that bear directly on the necessity of detention. Failure to consider whether ordinary prosecution was being pursued, or was not pressed, amounts to non-application of mind and vitiates the detention order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:34:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1097 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194616</link>
      <description>In preventive detention matters, a post-execution habeas corpus challenge remains maintainable where an earlier pre-execution challenge was left open for permissible grounds after service of the detention order. Territorial jurisdiction can be founded where the detention order is served, custody is suffered, and related rejection communications are received within the Court&#039;s limits. Material placed before the Detaining Authority must include written submissions and settlement-record documents that bear directly on the necessity of detention. Failure to consider whether ordinary prosecution was being pursued, or was not pressed, amounts to non-application of mind and vitiates the detention order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>