<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1368 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194623</link>
    <description>Where all equity shareholders of the applicant company had given written consent to the proposed amalgamation scheme and there were no secured or unsecured creditors, the meeting of equity shareholders could be dispensed with. The court accepted that, on these facts, convening the meeting was unnecessary and allowed the company application to proceed without it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:34:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1368 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194623</link>
      <description>Where all equity shareholders of the applicant company had given written consent to the proposed amalgamation scheme and there were no secured or unsecured creditors, the meeting of equity shareholders could be dispensed with. The court accepted that, on these facts, convening the meeting was unnecessary and allowed the company application to proceed without it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>