<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1077 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the SEBI order due to a lack of natural justice, emphasizing the importance of giving parties a fair hearing before issuing prejudicial orders. The matter was remanded to SEBI for fresh consideration, with directions to address jurisdictional issues and provide the appellants with necessary documents. Cooperation was urged to expedite the process within six weeks, stressing the significance of prompt and transparent regulatory actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1077 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the SEBI order due to a lack of natural justice, emphasizing the importance of giving parties a fair hearing before issuing prejudicial orders. The matter was remanded to SEBI for fresh consideration, with directions to address jurisdictional issues and provide the appellants with necessary documents. Cooperation was urged to expedite the process within six weeks, stressing the significance of prompt and transparent regulatory actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>