https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194607 Territorial jurisdiction was upheld for a pre-execution challenge to a preventive detention order because threatened execution within the court's limits, including at the petitioner's residence, was sufficient to attract jurisdiction. Pre-execution review was recognised in principle, but only within narrow categories such as lack of authority, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague or irrelevant grounds, so the petition was maintainable only within that limited framework. However, quashing was declined because the impugned detention order was not produced on record, leaving the court unable to examine its legality or correctness on merits. en-us Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194607 Territorial jurisdiction was upheld for a pre-execution challenge to a preventive detention order because threatened execution within the court's limits, including at the petitioner's residence, was sufficient to attract jurisdiction. Pre-execution review was recognised in principle, but only within narrow categories such as lack of authority, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague or irrelevant grounds, so the petition was maintainable only within that limited framework. However, quashing was declined because the impugned detention order was not produced on record, leaving the court unable to examine its legality or correctness on merits. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194607