<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1512 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2006-07 for statistical purposes and partly allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2007-08. The judgment emphasized the need for proper adjudication based on Tribunal directions and the requirement of evidence for the treatment of outstanding liabilities under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:28:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1512 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2006-07 for statistical purposes and partly allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2007-08. The judgment emphasized the need for proper adjudication based on Tribunal directions and the requirement of evidence for the treatment of outstanding liabilities under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>