<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 362 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194594</link>
    <description>Default bail granted under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC is not automatically lost when a charge-sheet is later filed. Because such release is treated as bail under Chapter XXXIII, cancellation must be sought under the recognised cancellation powers and supported by independent grounds such as misuse of liberty, tampering with evidence, interference with trial or investigation, or other strong reasons showing custody is necessary. The later filing of the charge-sheet alone is insufficient. A dissenting view stated that the court could reconsider cancellation on the basis of the challan material if it showed reasonable grounds and the need for custody.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:23:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 362 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194594</link>
      <description>Default bail granted under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC is not automatically lost when a charge-sheet is later filed. Because such release is treated as bail under Chapter XXXIII, cancellation must be sought under the recognised cancellation powers and supported by independent grounds such as misuse of liberty, tampering with evidence, interference with trial or investigation, or other strong reasons showing custody is necessary. The later filing of the charge-sheet alone is insufficient. A dissenting view stated that the court could reconsider cancellation on the basis of the challan material if it showed reasonable grounds and the need for custody.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>