<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 104 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9923</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not deduct the subsidy amount from the asset cost for depreciation calculation and to treat the ore shed as part of the plant, allowing depreciation and extra shift allowance. The Court found the ore shed to be integral to the plant&#039;s operations, facilitating the processing of raw materials efficiently. The judgment affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s rulings, disposing of the reference without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 104 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9923</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not deduct the subsidy amount from the asset cost for depreciation calculation and to treat the ore shed as part of the plant, allowing depreciation and extra shift allowance. The Court found the ore shed to be integral to the plant&#039;s operations, facilitating the processing of raw materials efficiently. The judgment affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s rulings, disposing of the reference without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>