<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 824 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348067</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and allowing the appeals by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The decision clarified the tax treatment of interest income earned on unutilized funds borrowed for business purposes, emphasizing the importance of statutory provisions and legal precedents in determining the appropriate tax liability in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 824 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348067</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and allowing the appeals by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The decision clarified the tax treatment of interest income earned on unutilized funds borrowed for business purposes, emphasizing the importance of statutory provisions and legal precedents in determining the appropriate tax liability in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>