<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 821 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348064</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the Assessing Officer, CIT(A), and Tribunal were all based in New Delhi. The Court directed the revenue to file the appeal before the competent court with the appropriate jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 821 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348064</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the Assessing Officer, CIT(A), and Tribunal were all based in New Delhi. The Court directed the revenue to file the appeal before the competent court with the appropriate jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>