<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 819 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the addition based on the DVO report and the denial of the 15% deduction from the cost of construction. The Tribunal found the DVO&#039;s rates reasonable and the 7.5% self-supervision rebate appropriate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 819 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the addition based on the DVO report and the denial of the 15% deduction from the cost of construction. The Tribunal found the DVO&#039;s rates reasonable and the 7.5% self-supervision rebate appropriate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>