<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 810 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the compensation received by the assessee for surrendering allotment of flats should be taxed as capital gains, allowing her the benefit of indexation. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee on the jurisdictional issue of additions made without incriminating material. The order was pronounced on 1st September 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 810 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the compensation received by the assessee for surrendering allotment of flats should be taxed as capital gains, allowing her the benefit of indexation. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee on the jurisdictional issue of additions made without incriminating material. The order was pronounced on 1st September 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>