<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 795 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348038</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the court, affirming the decision of the lower authorities. The court found that the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on the refunded sum lacked legal grounds as there were no statutory provisions supporting such a claim. The voluntary nature of the advance payment made during adjudication was highlighted, leading to the absence of penalties imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 795 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348038</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the court, affirming the decision of the lower authorities. The court found that the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on the refunded sum lacked legal grounds as there were no statutory provisions supporting such a claim. The voluntary nature of the advance payment made during adjudication was highlighted, leading to the absence of penalties imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>