<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 790 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348033</link>
    <description>Service tax liability on Sopo charges and shop rent could not be finally determined because the adjudicating authority had not made clear findings on the nature and purpose of the collections. The record left uncertainty over whether the amounts related to open spaces, vacant land, or rental from shops, and the segregation of Sopo charges from shop rent also needed verification. The matter was therefore remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after proper examination of the collections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:44:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 790 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348033</link>
      <description>Service tax liability on Sopo charges and shop rent could not be finally determined because the adjudicating authority had not made clear findings on the nature and purpose of the collections. The record left uncertainty over whether the amounts related to open spaces, vacant land, or rental from shops, and the segregation of Sopo charges from shop rent also needed verification. The matter was therefore remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after proper examination of the collections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>