<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 784 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the guarantee provided by the Government of India to Neyveli Lignite Corporation did not constitute a taxable business support service under the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal clarified that the Government&#039;s guarantee fell under the category of &quot;Banking and Financial Service&quot; rather than &quot;Business Support Service,&quot; as it primarily secured financial commitments and did not align with providing support services of business or commerce. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions, highlighting the distinct nature of guarantees in the financial context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 784 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the guarantee provided by the Government of India to Neyveli Lignite Corporation did not constitute a taxable business support service under the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal clarified that the Government&#039;s guarantee fell under the category of &quot;Banking and Financial Service&quot; rather than &quot;Business Support Service,&quot; as it primarily secured financial commitments and did not align with providing support services of business or commerce. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions, highlighting the distinct nature of guarantees in the financial context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>