<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 75 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9917</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case (appeal) concerning the interpretation and application of section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, Explanation 5, validity of penalty cancellations by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), and assessment of additional income leading to penalty imposition. The judgment emphasized factual findings, statutory provisions, and genuineness of explanations in penalty proceedings for income concealment and inaccurate particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 75 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9917</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case (appeal) concerning the interpretation and application of section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, Explanation 5, validity of penalty cancellations by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), and assessment of additional income leading to penalty imposition. The judgment emphasized factual findings, statutory provisions, and genuineness of explanations in penalty proceedings for income concealment and inaccurate particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>