https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348021 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee, classifying the products under excise tariff entry 09109100 instead of as mixed condiments. Citing a previous case, the Tribunal found the Revenue's arguments lacking and dismissed their appeals, criticizing the review authorities for questioning decisions without valid reasons. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of judicial discipline and upheld the appellant-assessee's classification, setting aside the demand for excise duty and penalties, except for specific items. en-us Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:32:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348021 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee, classifying the products under excise tariff entry 09109100 instead of as mixed condiments. Citing a previous case, the Tribunal found the Revenue's arguments lacking and dismissed their appeals, criticizing the review authorities for questioning decisions without valid reasons. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of judicial discipline and upheld the appellant-assessee's classification, setting aside the demand for excise duty and penalties, except for specific items. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348021