<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 774 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, regarding the eligibility of availing CENVAT credit for input services related to Biodiesel production and export. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contentions, citing precedents from High Courts to support the appellant&#039;s position. The Tribunal also rejected the Departmental Representative&#039;s arguments on the timing of CENVAT credit availment before registration, setting aside the related demand. Additionally, the issue of availment based on photocopies of invoices was remanded for further consideration, allowing the appellant to provide original documents for verification. The appeal was disposed of with emphasis on adherence to procedural requirements and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 774 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, regarding the eligibility of availing CENVAT credit for input services related to Biodiesel production and export. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contentions, citing precedents from High Courts to support the appellant&#039;s position. The Tribunal also rejected the Departmental Representative&#039;s arguments on the timing of CENVAT credit availment before registration, setting aside the related demand. Additionally, the issue of availment based on photocopies of invoices was remanded for further consideration, allowing the appellant to provide original documents for verification. The appeal was disposed of with emphasis on adherence to procedural requirements and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>