<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 773 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by M/s Agrawal Sponge Pvt. Ltd. against the Order-in-Original confirming the demand of Cenvat credit. The Tribunal upheld the demand related to disputed Cenvat credit amount but found a portion of the credit admissible based on precedents cited by the appellant. The Tribunal modified the impugned order, confirming the demand for a certain amount of Cenvat credit while setting aside the demand for the remaining sum. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the receipt and utilization of certain goods and the appellant&#039;s failure to substantiate their claims adequately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 773 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by M/s Agrawal Sponge Pvt. Ltd. against the Order-in-Original confirming the demand of Cenvat credit. The Tribunal upheld the demand related to disputed Cenvat credit amount but found a portion of the credit admissible based on precedents cited by the appellant. The Tribunal modified the impugned order, confirming the demand for a certain amount of Cenvat credit while setting aside the demand for the remaining sum. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the receipt and utilization of certain goods and the appellant&#039;s failure to substantiate their claims adequately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>