<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 766 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit on input services such as outdoor caterer service, rent-a-cab service, hospitality service, and club service. Relying on previous judgments and consistent allowance of credit for similar services, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and permitted the credit. The appeal the appellant sought to withdraw was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:25:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 766 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit on input services such as outdoor caterer service, rent-a-cab service, hospitality service, and club service. Relying on previous judgments and consistent allowance of credit for similar services, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and permitted the credit. The appeal the appellant sought to withdraw was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>