https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348007 The court dismissed the petition seeking direction to inspect the public file for an anti-dumping investigation on seamless tubes from China PR. The petitioner's delay in requesting information for an appeal before CESTAT, despite awareness of the notification, was deemed unjustified. The court found the petitioner's explanation unconvincing and questioned the bonafides of the request for information. Emphasizing the importance of timely actions and valid justifications, the court expressed skepticism towards the petitioner's motives and perceived attempt to use the inspection request to explain the appeal filing delay. en-us Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 18:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348007 The court dismissed the petition seeking direction to inspect the public file for an anti-dumping investigation on seamless tubes from China PR. The petitioner's delay in requesting information for an appeal before CESTAT, despite awareness of the notification, was deemed unjustified. The court found the petitioner's explanation unconvincing and questioned the bonafides of the request for information. Emphasizing the importance of timely actions and valid justifications, the court expressed skepticism towards the petitioner's motives and perceived attempt to use the inspection request to explain the appeal filing delay. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348007