https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348006 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether the respondent authority is within the court's territorial limits or whether a part of the cause of action arose there. Mere service of a detention order or the petitioner's residence in the forum State does not by itself confer jurisdiction. Applying that principle to a habeas corpus challenge to a detention order issued in Maharashtra, with the detention, arrest, bail proceedings and related events all arising in Mumbai, the Punjab and Haryana High Court found that no part of the cause of action arose within its territorial limits and therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the petition. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348006 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether the respondent authority is within the court's territorial limits or whether a part of the cause of action arose there. Mere service of a detention order or the petitioner's residence in the forum State does not by itself confer jurisdiction. Applying that principle to a habeas corpus challenge to a detention order issued in Maharashtra, with the detention, arrest, bail proceedings and related events all arising in Mumbai, the Punjab and Haryana High Court found that no part of the cause of action arose within its territorial limits and therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the petition. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348006