https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347997 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Customs violated mandatory time limits prescribed under Regulation 22 of CHALR, 2004, without valid reasons, citing legal precedents emphasizing the mandatory nature of such time limits. The impugned order was deemed to contravene established legal principles, leading to its setting aside and the appellant's appeal being granted. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:44:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347997 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Customs violated mandatory time limits prescribed under Regulation 22 of CHALR, 2004, without valid reasons, citing legal precedents emphasizing the mandatory nature of such time limits. The impugned order was deemed to contravene established legal principles, leading to its setting aside and the appellant's appeal being granted. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347997