<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 135 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9909</link>
    <description>Retention money under a contract does not accrue as income until the contractual obligations are satisfactorily completed, because the right to receive it remains contingent on fulfilment of those conditions. On that principle, the retained amount was treated as deferred rather than accrued income, and it was not taxable in the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 135 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9909</link>
      <description>Retention money under a contract does not accrue as income until the contractual obligations are satisfactorily completed, because the right to receive it remains contingent on fulfilment of those conditions. On that principle, the retained amount was treated as deferred rather than accrued income, and it was not taxable in the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>