https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347989 The Court condoned the delay in re-filing the appeal and allowed it subject to just exceptions. The appeal challenged the ITAT's orders for AY 2008-09 regarding tax deductions by the Respondent-Assessee. Despite the initial disallowance by the Assessing Officer, the CIT (A) partly allowed the appeal. The ITAT affirmed the CIT (A)'s decision but rectified its order based on a previous appeal. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial legal questions, and upheld the rectification by the ITAT for AY 2008-09. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:08:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347989 The Court condoned the delay in re-filing the appeal and allowed it subject to just exceptions. The appeal challenged the ITAT's orders for AY 2008-09 regarding tax deductions by the Respondent-Assessee. Despite the initial disallowance by the Assessing Officer, the CIT (A) partly allowed the appeal. The ITAT affirmed the CIT (A)'s decision but rectified its order based on a previous appeal. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial legal questions, and upheld the rectification by the ITAT for AY 2008-09. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347989