<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 742 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347985</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned assessment order under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2010-2011 due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to consider and decide on the objections raised by the petitioner before passing the order. The petitioner was not given a reasonable opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The Assessing Officer was instructed to promptly address the objections and communicate a reasoned order to the petitioner. The Assessing Officer was allowed to proceed with the assessment if the proceedings were not dropped, with other contentions left open for determination by the appropriate forum. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:08:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 742 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347985</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned assessment order under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2010-2011 due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to consider and decide on the objections raised by the petitioner before passing the order. The petitioner was not given a reasonable opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The Assessing Officer was instructed to promptly address the objections and communicate a reasoned order to the petitioner. The Assessing Officer was allowed to proceed with the assessment if the proceedings were not dropped, with other contentions left open for determination by the appropriate forum. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>