<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 740 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347983</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted the appeal on the disallowance of salary expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) and remanded the issue of Section 40(ba) for fresh consideration. The appeal regarding the disallowance of administrative expenses was dismissed. The Tribunal was directed to thoroughly reconsider the applicability of Section 40(ba) and provide a clear and detailed order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 740 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347983</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted the appeal on the disallowance of salary expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) and remanded the issue of Section 40(ba) for fresh consideration. The appeal regarding the disallowance of administrative expenses was dismissed. The Tribunal was directed to thoroughly reconsider the applicability of Section 40(ba) and provide a clear and detailed order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>