<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 712 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting refunds for credit on Outdoor Catering Service and based on debit notes. However, the appeal for the refund related to Service Tax on Telephone Bills raised in individuals&#039; names was not allowed, with the issue left open for further consideration. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 712 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting refunds for credit on Outdoor Catering Service and based on debit notes. However, the appeal for the refund related to Service Tax on Telephone Bills raised in individuals&#039; names was not allowed, with the issue left open for further consideration. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>