<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 711 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for transportation services of marble blocks as the services were not provided by a Goods Transport Agency due to the absence of a consignment note. The decision was based on the definition of taxable service and requirements for services provided by a Goods Transport Agency, as outlined in previous judgments and relevant tax rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 711 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for transportation services of marble blocks as the services were not provided by a Goods Transport Agency due to the absence of a consignment note. The decision was based on the definition of taxable service and requirements for services provided by a Goods Transport Agency, as outlined in previous judgments and relevant tax rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>