<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 707 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellants&#039; claims for rebate of service tax paid on exported services under the Finance Act, 1994 and Export of Service Rules, 2005. It held that the limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applied to the claims. Two claims were time-barred as they were filed beyond the prescribed period from payment receipt. Consequently, these claims were rejected, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 707 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellants&#039; claims for rebate of service tax paid on exported services under the Finance Act, 1994 and Export of Service Rules, 2005. It held that the limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applied to the claims. Two claims were time-barred as they were filed beyond the prescribed period from payment receipt. Consequently, these claims were rejected, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>