<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 691 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347934</link>
    <description>Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 was unavailable where exported final products were cleared on payment of duty under a rebate claim, because the refund mechanism applies only to exports made without payment of duty under the prescribed bond procedure and excludes cases where rebate or drawback is claimed. As the goods were exported on payment of duty, the condition precedent for refund was not met. The rejection of the refund claim was therefore in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:44:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 691 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347934</link>
      <description>Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 was unavailable where exported final products were cleared on payment of duty under a rebate claim, because the refund mechanism applies only to exports made without payment of duty under the prescribed bond procedure and excludes cases where rebate or drawback is claimed. As the goods were exported on payment of duty, the condition precedent for refund was not met. The rejection of the refund claim was therefore in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>