https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347930 The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for provisional release of goods pending adjudication upon receipt of an expert report. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence alleged misdeclaration by the petitioner, including discrepancies in goods declaration and unauthorized use of an import/export code. The court emphasized the importance of accurate declaration in customs documents and the need for thorough investigation by authorities. It highlighted the petitioner's right to seek provisional release and the obligation to adhere to legal procedures in customs enforcement, ensuring a fair and timely resolution of the matter. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347930 The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for provisional release of goods pending adjudication upon receipt of an expert report. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence alleged misdeclaration by the petitioner, including discrepancies in goods declaration and unauthorized use of an import/export code. The court emphasized the importance of accurate declaration in customs documents and the need for thorough investigation by authorities. It highlighted the petitioner's right to seek provisional release and the obligation to adhere to legal procedures in customs enforcement, ensuring a fair and timely resolution of the matter. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347930