<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 683 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347926</link>
    <description>The appeal involved the confiscation of Red Sanders under the Customs Act, 1962, with a penalty of Rs. 25,00,000 imposed on the appellant. Despite the appellant&#039;s defense of informing authorities about the missing container, the penalty was upheld due to fraudulent involvement in an illicit export scheme. The penalty amount was reduced to Rs. 15,00,000 on appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s liability under Section 114 (i) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:42:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 683 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347926</link>
      <description>The appeal involved the confiscation of Red Sanders under the Customs Act, 1962, with a penalty of Rs. 25,00,000 imposed on the appellant. Despite the appellant&#039;s defense of informing authorities about the missing container, the penalty was upheld due to fraudulent involvement in an illicit export scheme. The penalty amount was reduced to Rs. 15,00,000 on appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s liability under Section 114 (i) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>