<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 120 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9899</link>
    <description>The court held that the provisions of rule 8A are directory, allowing the benefit of development allowance if the certificate is submitted at the time of assessment. Additionally, adjustments under section 143(1)(a) are only permissible for prima facie inadmissible claims, not for those requiring proof, thus the assessee was not liable for additional tax. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 120 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9899</link>
      <description>The court held that the provisions of rule 8A are directory, allowing the benefit of development allowance if the certificate is submitted at the time of assessment. Additionally, adjustments under section 143(1)(a) are only permissible for prima facie inadmissible claims, not for those requiring proof, thus the assessee was not liable for additional tax. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>