<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1480 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194569</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of prior period expenses by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and adherence to accounting principles under the mercantile system. The decision was based on legal precedents and the lack of a valid basis for disallowing the expenses, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1480 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194569</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of prior period expenses by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and adherence to accounting principles under the mercantile system. The decision was based on legal precedents and the lack of a valid basis for disallowing the expenses, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>