<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1124 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that they were eligible for cenvat credit on duty paid defective goods received in the factory. The Tribunal found that the appellant had maintained proper records linking the defective goods to the duty paid documents, contrary to the lower authorities&#039; denial of credit. The impugned order confirming the Cenvat demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:58:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1124 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that they were eligible for cenvat credit on duty paid defective goods received in the factory. The Tribunal found that the appellant had maintained proper records linking the defective goods to the duty paid documents, contrary to the lower authorities&#039; denial of credit. The impugned order confirming the Cenvat demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>