<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 133 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9896</link>
    <description>Demand notices under the Assam Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1939 were upheld because the assessee did not show that the corresponding central income-tax assessments had actually been revised, rectified or set aside in a manner requiring reassessment under the Assam Act. The statutory link between central and agricultural-income assessments did not invalidate the demand on the basis of pending appellate proceedings alone. A separate challenge based on alleged refund claims for later assessment years also failed, as refund requires completion of the statutory refund process and a mere assertion of excess payment cannot defeat an earlier demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 133 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9896</link>
      <description>Demand notices under the Assam Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1939 were upheld because the assessee did not show that the corresponding central income-tax assessments had actually been revised, rectified or set aside in a manner requiring reassessment under the Assam Act. The statutory link between central and agricultural-income assessments did not invalidate the demand on the basis of pending appellate proceedings alone. A separate challenge based on alleged refund claims for later assessment years also failed, as refund requires completion of the statutory refund process and a mere assertion of excess payment cannot defeat an earlier demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>