https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194552 A co-owner and executor named under a Will could maintain an eviction suit without prior probate or letters of administration, because title of the executor flows from the Will and a co-owner may sue for eviction absent partition or competing entitlement. The tenant's Section 53-A defence also failed: the record treated the payment as a security deposit under the tenancy, not sale consideration, and the appellant did not prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the alleged agreement to sell. On these findings, the eviction decree and revisional order were upheld and no interference was made. en-us Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:03:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194552 A co-owner and executor named under a Will could maintain an eviction suit without prior probate or letters of administration, because title of the executor flows from the Will and a co-owner may sue for eviction absent partition or competing entitlement. The tenant's Section 53-A defence also failed: the record treated the payment as a security deposit under the tenancy, not sale consideration, and the appellant did not prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the alleged agreement to sell. On these findings, the eviction decree and revisional order were upheld and no interference was made. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194552