<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 576 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194551</link>
    <description>A statutory road transport corporation constituted to provide public transport services was held to be engaged in a service-oriented undertaking rather than trade or commerce. Its powers to deal with property, stores, and scrap were merely incidental to that dominant purpose. Repeated sales of scrap, old buses, spare parts, and other unserviceable material did not amount to a separate business of selling goods, because the items were discarded assets used in the transport undertaking and not goods held for resale. The corporation was therefore not a dealer liable to sales tax on those transactions, and the disputed sales were not taxable as business turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:07:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 576 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194551</link>
      <description>A statutory road transport corporation constituted to provide public transport services was held to be engaged in a service-oriented undertaking rather than trade or commerce. Its powers to deal with property, stores, and scrap were merely incidental to that dominant purpose. Repeated sales of scrap, old buses, spare parts, and other unserviceable material did not amount to a separate business of selling goods, because the items were discarded assets used in the transport undertaking and not goods held for resale. The corporation was therefore not a dealer liable to sales tax on those transactions, and the disputed sales were not taxable as business turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>