https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347911 The High Court set aside the ITAT's order on three miscellaneous applications under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act for AYs 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10, due to inconsistencies in the ITAT's decisions. The Court found merit in the Assessee's case, directing the ITAT to hear the appeals afresh considering the contradictions in its orders. The ITAT was instructed to pass new orders on merits after hearing the parties, providing relief to the Assessee based on the inconsistencies in the initial decisions. en-us Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:20:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347911 The High Court set aside the ITAT's order on three miscellaneous applications under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act for AYs 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10, due to inconsistencies in the ITAT's decisions. The Court found merit in the Assessee's case, directing the ITAT to hear the appeals afresh considering the contradictions in its orders. The ITAT was instructed to pass new orders on merits after hearing the parties, providing relief to the Assessee based on the inconsistencies in the initial decisions. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347911